Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!ihnp4!ihlpl!dritchey
From: dritchey@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Ritchey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Bug list for Microsoft C
Message-ID: <5909@ihlpl.ATT.COM>
Date: 20 Jul 88 02:42:10 GMT
References: <10807@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 39

in article <10807@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>, bobmon@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (RAMontante) says:
] seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan) writes:
] +iverson@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Tim Iverson) writes:
] +>int i=1, j=33;
] +>
] +>main() {
] +>    printf("%x\n", 1<<33);
] +>    printf("%x\n", 1>>33);
] +>    printf("%x\n", i<<j);
] +>    printf("%x\n", i>>j);
] +>}
] +Under Xenix '386, I get: 2, 0, 2, 0; using the '286 compiler, I get 0, 0, 2,
] +0.
] And Turbo C v1.5 gave me
] 0
] 0
] 0
] 0
] 
] Something of a letdown, that.  So what ARE the right numbers, and what is the
] right answer?

Well, I can't swear that this is the final word, but on an Amdahl
running UTS 5.2.6a (System V Release 2 + enhancements), the result was
0
0
0
0

I don't know if this is pure ANSI or K&R, but we use it for production
here.


Don --

Don Ritchey (312) 979-6179, AT&T Bell Laboratories, IH 2F-416
att!ihlpl!dritchey or dritchey@ihlpl.att.com {for smart mailers}
---------------------------
Education is the process of casting false pearls before real swine.
                -- Irsin Edman