Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!microsoft!leefi From: leefi@microsoft.UUCP (Lee Fisher) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: DOS 4.0 Summary: distinguishes the OLD DOS 4.0 from the NEW one Message-ID: <1660@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 30 Jul 88 04:11:21 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA Lines: 39 Recently, the question arose: > Anyone at Microsoft willing to give a definitive answer to: > "Will the real MS-DOS 4.0 please stand up?" ? People are confused about the OLD version of MS-DOS 4.0 (mentioned in various places, most notably Gordon Letwin's book, `Inside OS/2'), and the NEW version of MS-DOS 4.00 (recently announced on 7/19/88). Since they are differenct products, but they have the SAME version, people are confused (as was I). OK, I'll try to give a definitive answer, but please be sure to read my disclaimer at the end.... The OLD (multi-tasking) MS-DOS 4.0 was only released to a few OEMs in Europe. I don't believe that it will be supported (i.e., new releases of this product), although I don't know this for sure. If I had any say in the matter (I don't), I'd suggest that the OEMs that are using this old product move up to OS/2, since it gives much better multi- tasking support. The NEW (recently announced) MS-DOS 4.00 is based on the MS-DOS 3.3 sources. This new MS-DOS 4.00 does NOT contain any of the multi-tasking abilities that the older named MS-DOS 4.00 had. In contrast, the OLD MS-DOS 4.0 was based on older MS-DOS sources, something like MS-DOS 3.1 or 3.2. These multi-tasking features were not added to 3.3 and finally this recent 4.0. If anything, the multi-tasking code was inspiration for OS/2 (which, to make things more confusing, was initially named DOS 5). Hope this helps. -Lee ________ 01001100 Lee Fisher, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA. 01000101 leefi@microsof.beaver.washington.EDU 01000101 leefi%microsof@uw-beaver.ARPA leefi@microsof.UUCP 01000110 {decvax,decwrl,sco,sun,trsvax,uunet,uw-beaver}!microsof!leefi 01001001 DISCLAIMER: My opinions are my *OWN*, not those of my employer!