Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!denbeste
From: denbeste@bgsuvax.UUCP (William C. DenBesten)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Mouse cleaners
Message-ID: <2679@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: 22 Jul 88 16:27:51 GMT
References: <12383@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Lines: 21

From article <12383@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>, by phgun@violet.berkeley.edu (Himawan GUNADHI):
> But the lowpoint was when I compared the new mouse to
> those found in the SE (I had a couple at home then).
> They have the same basic ADB mouse design as the II,
> except that the cavity is larger (as in the +), the ball heavier
> and not sticky, the inside rollers are 2 steel and one plastic (as
> opposed to little spindly plastic ones in the II), and the teflon
> feet is also far superior. In fact my cover doesn't even fit
> properly. I noticed too that compared to the SE's mouse, mine has
> a seemingly more fragile and unnecessarily complicated construction
> around the cavity. The button sucks too- really stiff. 

It isn't that simple.  2 months ago, I got a mac II with the heavy mouse.
Earlier this week, I got in 16 Mac SEs.  Some of them had the heavy mouse,
and some had the light mice.

-- 
          William C. DenBesten |       denbeste@bgsu.edu
      Dept of Computer Science | CSNET denbeste%andy.bgsu.edu@relay.cs.net
Bowling Green State University | UUCP  ...!cbosgd!osu-cis!bgsuvax!denbeste
  Bowling Green, OH 43403-0214 |