Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!gatech!purdue!umd5!uvaarpa!virginia!mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU!ltt2p
From: ltt2p@mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU (Lucien T. Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: BinHex 4.0 vs 5.0 question
Summary: Both will work for de-hexing
Keywords: BinHex question
Message-ID: <1013@virginia.acc.virginia.edu>
Date: 25 Jul 88 13:04:39 GMT
References: <2142@alliant.Alliant.COM>
Sender: acc@virginia.acc.virginia.edu
Reply-To: ltt2p@mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU (Lucien T. Thompson)
Organization: Academic Computing Center, University of Va.
Lines: 17


     Either Binhex 4.0 or 5.0 will work fine for de-binhexing files
with that header.  If you are having problems, try stripping headers
and footers, and/or removing the blank line between that message and the
actual encoded file.
     
     As far as Kermit goes, I've always used text for downloads from our
Unix box.  Works fine...

     Have fun with 'em....

-Tres

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tres Thompson                                             ltt2p@virginia.edu
Not a student no more.............Yowsa, yowsa, yowsa, do-wah, do-wah, do...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------