Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!oliveb!sun!clem!cramer
From: cramer%clem@Sun.COM (Sam Cramer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LightspeedC 3.0 Review (long)
Message-ID: <61646@sun.uucp>
Date: 27 Jul 88 17:44:28 GMT
References: <7215@cup.portal.com> <76000259@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <1648@uokmax.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: cramer@sun.UUCP (Sam Cramer)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 11

In article <1648@uokmax.UUCP> rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K Shull) writes:
>>Dhrystones, and also Sun 3/50's, at as much as 4000+ Dhrystones on a
>>16.67Mhz 68020 (gcc compiler).  So I don't think that LightspeedC is
>
>A good example of how much the compiler can affect the results:
>	Using Sun's supplied compiler, the Sun 3/50 here gives a hair over
>2000 Dhrystones.

Using the SunOS 4.0 C compiler, setting optimization to -O4, and linking
-Bstatic, I get about 2700 dhrystones/sec.

Sam Cramer	sun!cramer  cramer@sun.com