Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo Pascal - Am I Nuts?
Message-ID: <5009@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 23 Jul 88 18:26:11 GMT
References: <7536@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 22

In article <7536@cup.portal.com> Mike_G_Newman@cup.portal.com writes:
>everyone likes LSP, but I'm afraid I abandoned it out of sloth -- 
>I didn't want to rewrite a lot of code that I had written in 
>MacPascal that was full of 'exit' statements.)

	Macintosh Pascal doesn't have an Exit statement, last I checked.
In fact, if you wrote code in Macintosh Pascal, Lightspeed Pascal
is an ideal upgrade, since the two are one hundred percent source-compatible.

		--Rich

Rich Siegel
THINK Technologies



Rich Siegel
Quality Assurance Technician
THINK Technologies Division, Symantec Corp.
Internet: singer@endor.harvard.edu
UUCP: ..harvard!endor!singer
Phone: (617) 275-4800 x305