Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!ncc!lyndon
From: lyndon@ncc.Nexus.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent
Subject: Re: BIND and resolver routines under Dynix 3.0.4
Message-ID: <10344@ncc.Nexus.CA>
Date: 17 Jul 88 22:30:20 GMT
References: <143@daitc.ARPA> <2961@cs.utexas.edu> <4080@oxtrap.UUCP> <44375@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV>
Reply-To: lyndon@ncc.nexus.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg)
Organization: Nexus Computing Inc.
Lines: 15

In article <44375@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV> rick@seismo.CSS.GOV (Rick Adams) writes:
>The Sequent could be a wonderful networking machine if they would let
>the engineers keep the networking software within 3-4 years of current
>technology.
>
>Sequent has a very nice hardware base, but I really wish I could
>call the software something better than "adequate".

What was the criteria used to select the system that would run uunet?

It seems to me that a reliable and complete set of networking tools
would be of prime importance in this application.

-- 
{alberta,pyramid,uunet}!ncc!lyndon  lyndon@Nexus.CA