Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!mimsy!eneevax!umd5!umbc3!cbw1!brian
From: brian@cbw1.UUCP (Brian Cuthie)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Bell Tech Pricing
Keywords: Advertising Pranks
Message-ID: <193@cbw1.UUCP>
Date: 21 Jul 88 03:44:24 GMT
References: <294@gandalf.littlei.UUCP> <236@belltec.UUCP> <6475@bcsaic.UUCP> <1850@van-bc.UUCP>
Reply-To: brian@cbw1.UMD.EDU (Brian Cuthie)
Organization: CBW, Columbia, MD 21046
Lines: 17


It seems like the only issue here is how people define "complete."  I have
to wonder how long this argument can go on.  Personally I prefer to think
of "complete" as being "everything."  Obviously Bell-Tech and their
supporters think complete has a different definition.   I don't know that
there is any point in wasting 10k/day in net bandwidth in obscured arguments
over the definition of complete.

Just my $.02 worth :-)  (please direct flames to alt.flame -- I don't
subscribe to that news group)

-brian
-- 
Brian D. Cuthie                                 uunet!umbc3!cbw1!brian
Columbia, MD                                    brian@umbc3.umd.edu
"Captain, Captain! All the stars have gone out!"
"No, you fool, you've leaned on the button.  Turn the viewer back on!"