Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!uport!plocher
From: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Unbundling - we all do it, so let's stop complaining
Keywords: Support is the key
Message-ID: <393@uport.UUCP>
Date: 2 Aug 88 00:50:40 GMT
References: <294@gandalf.littlei.UUCP> <236@belltec.UUCP> <6475@bcsaic.UUCP> <243@belltec.UUCP> <192@focsys.UUCP> <10583@lll-winken.llnl.gov> <382@uport.UUCP> <739@mccc.UUCP>
Reply-To: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher)
Organization: Microport Systems, Scotts Valley, CA
Lines: 28

In article <739@mccc.UUCP> pjh@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg) writes:
>In article <382@uport.UUCP> plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher) writes:
>...What does the extra $783 get you from Microport?
>...  o  Me :-)
>...  -John Plocher
>
>OK - so where's the answer to my oft-repeated questions about "assign"
>and the LogiTech mouse, already?

With DosMerge 1.0 (and not 0.2 or 0.3) you add the following line to the file
/etc/dosdev
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
dmouse d .23c-23f.5..     LogiTech Bus Mouse
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

where:	
	dmouse	= direct attach mouse, the "logical" name
	d	= direct attach
		  (v = virtual, r = real, f = file name, l = drive letter)
	23c-23f	= io port addresses
	5	= interrupt line
	..	= No DMA channels
		  The rest of the line is a comment


DosMerge versions before 1.0 won't work with many direct attach devices.

	-John Plocher