Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!ns!ddb
From: ddb@ns.UUCP (David Dyer-Bennet)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: VI vs. Emacs
Summary: emacs IS teco
Message-ID: <499@ns.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jul 88 19:34:04 GMT
References: <1615@bu-tyng.bu.edu> <31073@cca.CCA.COM>
Organization: Network Systems Corp. Mpls MN
Lines: 13

In article <31073@cca.CCA.COM>, g-rh@cca.CCA.COM (Richard Harter) writes:
> Everyone knows that real programmers use TECO for wimpy stuff like
> text editing and writing operating systems.  
  Well, of COURSE.  But emacs IS teco; just a few simple teco macros is
all there is to it :-)  (I started using emacs on tops-20, which ran the
(current version of the) original ITS emacs under the "incompatibility
package", so this was true for that version, anyway.)


-- 
	-- David Dyer-Bennet
	...!{rutgers!dayton | amdahl!ems | uunet!rosevax}!umn-cs!ns!ddb
	ddb@viper.Lynx.MN.Org, ...{amdahl,hpda}!bungia!viper!ddb
	Fidonet 1:282/341.0, (612) 721-8967 hst/2400/1200/300