Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!ucsd!ucsdhub!jack!nusdhub!rwhite
From: rwhite@nusdhub.UUCP (Robert C. White Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: The Name of the Beast
Message-ID: <1117@nusdhub.UUCP>
Date: 27 Jul 88 18:12:29 GMT
References: <5007@husc6.harvard.edu>
Organization: National University, San Diego
Lines: 17

in article <5007@husc6.harvard.edu>, sob@harvisr.harvard.edu (Scott Bradner) says:
> I know that there are many more, can I be enlightened by the semi-assembled
> masses?

According to information handed out at U3G at the beginning of this
year;  AT&T states spesificly that there is *only* one way to
refer to the UNIX System products, and that is:

"UNIX(TM) System" followed by whatever designation of type or
product you are spesifically refering.  AT&T is presently persuing
persons or companies which violate this, in an effort ro retain their
trade mark.  They spesifically state that it is never correct to
use "UNIX (e.g. alone w/no "(tm)"); Unix (ever); or unix (ever)."

Just thought you'd like to know what AT&T told us.

Rob.