Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2796 comp.unix.microport:1098
Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!bungia!pwcs!elric!hawkmoon!det
From: det@hawkmoon.MN.ORG (Derek E. Terveer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: WD1006 Controller on 386/ix
Message-ID: <205@hawkmoon.MN.ORG>
Date: 27 Jul 88 07:58:40 GMT
References: <865@altger.UUCP> <4796@bigtex.uucp>
Organization: One of the Eternal Champions - Richfield, MN, 554232523, USA
Lines: 14

In article <4796@bigtex.uucp>, james@bigtex.uucp (James Van Artsdalen) writes:
> However, if a file system gets this badly fragmented, it should
> probably be cleaned up for speed.  In particular, I re-load my
> /usr/local directory regularly so that emacs and other binaries are
> kept unfragmented for quick loading by my 1:1 controller (WD1007/WA2).

I don't quite understand this statement.  I would think that unless you are
creating and removing a lot of files in that directory (fs), in particular the
binaries you are talking about, you wouldn't be fragmenting.. this is, in
essence, a read/only situation.
-- 
Derek Terveer		det@hawkmoon.MN.ORG
			w(612)681-6986
			h(612)688-0667