Xref: utzoo news.admin:3017 misc.legal:5240 soc.women:11958 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!mejac!gryphon!oleg From: oleg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Oleg Kiselev) Newsgroups: news.admin,misc.legal,soc.women Subject: Re: Proposed lawsuit Message-ID: <4885@gryphon.CTS.COM> Date: 17 Jul 88 19:09:38 GMT References: <12165@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: oleg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Oleg Kiselev) Organization: HASA Lines: 65 In article <12165@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> era1987@violet.berkeley.edu () writes: >It is grounds for a civil tort when somebody deliberately and >knowingly inflicts emotional distress on someone who is emotionally >disabled. Oleg mentions that I'm on disability... That's information YOU have made public. If you did not wish that info to be known, you should not have flounted it earlier. If referring to your (publicly known) gender can be constituted as a "knowing infliction of emotional dissterss" then your repeated rabid attacks on men of the NET in general and women who disagree with you can be equally construed as deliberate attempts to inflict emotional disstress. A class action suit? And there is this matter of "pseudo"s. I, for one, am very disturbed and offended when someone tries to insinuate that I am nothing but a "pseudo" designed to harrass some lunatic. Another law suit? >The only help >I get is the right to sue in forma pauperis, without paying court >fees, and to have subpoenas served without any cost to me. Right. Use the money that we pay to support you to extort more money from us. And after all this Skyler complains about the attitude we all take to MES! >I will also seek to have all sites not subject to EEO/AA laws, >dropped from Usenet unless they sign a nondiscrimination pledge, >so that other sites cannot be liable for discrimination by people >at sites that do not require verification and do not recognize >antidiscrimination laws. You ARE mad. EEO/AA laws prevent EMPLOYMENT discrimination. You are not employed at all. These laws will not help you. And you seem to be not too familiar with the structure and nature of USENET to contemplate something like this... >... but the repeated references to my poverty by Kiselev and >Vajk have shown me that that would be a serious mistake. A large part >of the reason they do not respect my rights is that I am poor. Bullshit. Your "rights" as you see them (a grammatical nuisance built out of your persecution complex and inability to deal with your gender) have been violated only in the sense that people have been applying "normal" usage to pronouns. Your financial status is of no interest to me other than the fact that *MY* taxes are paying for your bills in general and for your access to the NET in particular. You are a LIAR, Mark. *I* have only referred to your "poverty" at most 2 times, both in the last 2 weeks, when the analogy between you and K*nt Paul Dolan was brought up. You make it sound (as you always do) like Vajk and I spend all our time discussing your private affairs on the NET, always remembering to mention that you are a "sick, old Jewish woman on wellfare" *** Mark, do not threaten people unless you are ready to be responcible for your actions. Last time someone has taken you up on your threats was when Larry Lippman (sp?) has exposed you as a liar. We all recall what has happened then. -- Oleg Kiselev ARPA:{lcc|bilbo|frodo}.oleg@seas.ucla.edu (213)452-2435x354 USENET: oleg@gryphon.cts.com UUCP:...!{trwrb|ucla-cs}!lcc!oleg old adress: oleg@quad1.quad.com (still forwarded) DISCLAIMER: I speak for myself only.