Xref: utzoo news.admin:3062 misc.legal:5324 soc.women:12016
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!oliveb!intelca!mipos3!cadev4!ekwok
From: ekwok@cadev4.intel.com (Edward C. Kwok)
Newsgroups: news.admin,misc.legal,soc.women
Subject: Re: Proposed lawsuit
Message-ID: <2616@mipos3.intel.com>
Date: 19 Jul 88 15:47:20 GMT
References: <12165@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <1039@unccvax.UUCP>
Sender: nobody@mipos3.intel.com
Reply-To: ekwok@cadev4.UUCP (Edward C. Kwok)
Organization: Who's who in Anonymity, 1988
Lines: 12

In article <1039@unccvax.UUCP> dya@unccvax.UUCP (York David Anthony) writes:
>
>	Mark, you have to prove that your matter is one which may
>be properly brought to trial. It isn't.  Furthermore, you have to
>prove that you were not contributorily negligent (or otherwise).

Mark is alleging an intentional conduct, negligence has nothing to do
with it. He has to prove intent, unprivileged conduct, actual damage
and legal causation.


---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------