Xref: utzoo news.admin:3092 misc.legal:5375 soc.women:12080 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rcj@moss.ATT.COM From: rcj@moss.ATT.COM Newsgroups: news.admin,misc.legal,soc.women Subject: Re: Proposed lawsuit Keywords: Sexual, gender, discrimination,pronouns,language Message-ID: <29966@clyde.ATT.COM> Date: 21 Jul 88 18:29:52 GMT References: <12165@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <6278@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <12180@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <1040@unccvax.UUCP> <23898@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> <792@isieng.UUCP> Sender: nuucp@clyde.ATT.COM Reply-To: rcj@moss.UUCP (Curtis Jackson) Followup-To: soc.women Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany NJ Lines: 32 [I've directed followups to soc.women in an attempt to get the non-news- related crap out of news.admin] In article <792@isieng.UUCP> roy@isieng.UUCP (Roy Wells) writes: }In article <23898@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> wlieberm@teknowledge-vaxc.UUCP (William Lieberman) writes: }>Someone told me the term "mailman" in Boston was recently changed to }>"personperson". I don't believe it, but I bet it's not too far from }>the truth. I suppose if you do a little lexicographic investigation, Yes, it's true! And the government just last week passed special legislation declaring that as of 1 January 1989 all references to the word "woman" would be stricken from government documents and replaced with the non-sexist term "woperchild". Senator Politi Correct, Chair of the Committee for Frivolous Language Mutilation, explained the reason for the new term: "'woman' is clearly misleading, in that it contains the word 'man'; this is very sexist. We therefore changed the 'man' to 'person', giving us 'woperson'. But this has the male term 'son' in it, so we after much debate we substituted the non-sexist term 'child' for 'son', yielding the non-sexist and actually rather lyrical term 'woperchild'. We're all quite proud of it." Curtis Jackson -- moss!rcj 201-386-6409 (CORNET 232) ...![ att ulysses ucbvax allegra ]!moss!rcj ...![ att ucbvax akgua watmath ]!clyde!rcj P.S.: I do actually support non-sexist writing 100% -- firefighter, flight attendant, and the chair (as opposed to chair[wo]man) and such are really very nice, but I hate to see it taken to ungainly extremes. "Personhole cover" indeed! Hummph!