Xref: utzoo news.groups:4986 alt.config:506 news.misc:1655 Path: utzoo!mnetor!cxsea!ssc-vax!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!rutgers!njin!aramis.rutgers.edu!porthos.rutgers.edu!webber From: webber@porthos.rutgers.edu (Bob Webber) Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.config,news.misc Subject: [Correction of fact] Re: Is alt (doomed to be) a failure? Message-ID: Date: 23 Jul 88 14:42:42 GMT References: <3094@rayssd.ray.com} <4841@gryphon.CTS.COM} <9963@e.ms.uky.edu} <3293@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Followup-To: news.misc Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 16 In article <3293@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>, greg@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Gregory Nowak) writes: > ... > Right. Let's have a big round of applause for all those sites that > support the ENTIRE alt.net -- like rutgers, gryphon, and oddjob. Actually, rutgers is not among the enlightened -- hasn't been since the creation of alt.sex. At one point, some kind sole was crossposting alt.sex articles to news.groups -- presumably so that backwater sites like rutgers could read them. Now alas, we are cut off from the great big wonderful world of sex. I guess we will have to go back to learning about it in the back alleys of soc.singles and such. --- BOB (webber@athos.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!athos.rutgers.edu!webber) REASON: Didn't want anyone to be mislead into requesting an alt.sex feed from rutgers.