Xref: utzoo news.admin:3136 news.groups:5003 news.misc:1664
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!garnet!weemba
From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups,news.misc
Subject: Re: Digests
Message-ID: <12572@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 26 Jul 88 11:05:29 GMT
References: <440@vector.UUCP> <22336@tis.llnl.gov> <34248@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Followup-To: news.misc
Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central
Lines: 15
In-reply-to: ockerbloom-john@CS.YALE.EDU (John A. Ockerbloom)

In article <34248@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>, ockerbloom-john@CS (John A. Ockerbloom) writes:
>digest moderators should at least flag each new article with a Subject:
>line.  With a newsreader like rn, you can then skip ahead to each new
>article with Ctrl-G.

It is trivial to make the redefinition in rn to key on "^--------"s.

>Digests without Subject: lines (like the revived Computers and Society
>digest over on comp.society) take more work to go through,

Five minutes.  Five whole minutes by someone, somewhere on Usenet, who
then posts the secret of what to put in your comp.society KILL file.

I did it in five minutes for my own Gnews.  What's the big deal?

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720