Xref: utzoo sci.bio:1351 sci.misc:2111 sci.research:421 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!hc!lanl!beta!dd From: dd@beta.lanl.gov (Dan Davison) Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.misc,sci.research Subject: Re: Strange results in Nature article Summary: polywater strikes again??? Message-ID: <20850@beta.lanl.gov> Date: 23 Jul 88 02:14:18 GMT References: <10465@lll-winken.llnl.gov> Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Lines: 39 In article <10465@lll-winken.llnl.gov>, colvin@mahler.llnl.gov (Mike Colvin) writes: > > Has anyone read in the newsgroup read the article: "Human basophil > degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE" in > the June 30 Nature on page 816? It's also discussed in an editorial > entitled "When to Believe the Unbelievable" on page 787 of the same issue. > [much description deleted] > Anyway, I just wanted to point out this truly bizarre article and > would like to hear what other people have to say about it. I've been surprised by the lack of comment on the article in this newsgroup. I had to read the thing over 5 times before being comfortable with it. The extensive testing and reproducibiliy help a lot. This case appears to fall in one of two categories: (1) the famous "polywater" class, where some Russian scientists reported finding a state of water with very unusual properties, which eventually turned out to be contaminants. (2) A major paradigm breakdown. The latter would have impressively widespread consequences; my general feeling that any result that breaks that much physics and chemistry needs to be extremely carefully checked out. We will now have to endure years of extravagant homeopathic claims to the effect that mainline science now supports homeopathic theories; it may well turn out that they do, but a lot more evidence will have to be accumulated. This reminds me of the time (yes, Dizzy and Sam, I'm that old) when evidence was accumulating that DNA and RNA were not necessarily colinear. It seemed very unlikely, then just unlikely, then yeah maybe, then obviously true. Splicing, though *fit*; the current state of knowledge about the infinite-dilutibility of antibodies doesn't. -- dan davison/theoretical biology/t-10 ms k710/los alamos national laboratory los alamos, nm 875545/dd@lanl.gov (arpa)/dd@lanl.uucp(new)/..cmcl2!lanl!dd "I think, therefore I am confused"