Xref: utzoo sci.bio:1393 sci.misc:2212 sci.research:447 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!husc6!rutgers!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.misc,sci.research Subject: Re: Strange results in Nature article Message-ID: <8273@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: 30 Jul 88 05:18:34 GMT References: <2263@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <575@faui44.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 9 In article <575@faui44.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> dkhusema@faui44.UUCP (Dirk Husemann) writes: >At least it seems like a pretty weird practise to send in a *magician* >("The Amazing Randi") to investigate an issue which has been verified by >other labs also ... It not only seems like a sensible thing to do to me, I wish they had done some investigation like that before publishing such an article. I seem to recall that "polywater" was also verified by other labs.