Xref: utzoo sci.bio:1409 sci.misc:2239 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wyse!mips!prls!pyramid!thirdi!metapsy!sarge From: sarge@metapsy.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.misc Subject: Re: Strange results in Nature article (fallout...) Summary: We don't need a modern-day Inquisition Keywords: skepticism debunking Message-ID: <495@metapsy.UUCP> Date: 31 Jul 88 21:55:12 GMT References: <1911@aecom.YU.EDU> <6445@megaron.arizona.edu> <492@metapsy.UUCP> <668@ns.UUCP> Reply-To: sarge@metapsy.UUCP (Sarge Gerbode) Organization: Metapsychology, Woodside, CA Lines: 42 In article <668@ns.UUCP> logajan@ns.UUCP (John Logajan x3118) writes: >Debunkers, as distasteful as we may find them, are not police because they >have no coercive power. >The effect of debunkers, to the disapproval of their targets, is to scare >away money and students. Both of these are valuable resources. The words "scare" seems correct. Debunkers, like bigots, seem to me to play on our xenophobia, our dislike of new and strange world-views, in much the same way as McCarthyites played on our fear of Communism. A dread of having to live in some different sort of world seems to be extremely common. After all -- we fight wars to maintain the "American Way of Life", don't we? To me, what CSICOP was founded to do, and what it does do, is to engage in intellectual lynchings of people whose views are disturbing to its members. I believe their actions are intended to be coercive, even if not in a physical way. A person with a new, revolutionary theory is in a very vulnerable position, even when not confronted by an organization whose intent appears to be to stamp out such theories. Why make life even more difficult for such persons by hunting them down and pillorying them in public? >I think it is always in the interest of ... individuals to have >access to all sides of an argument. To suppress one side or the >other would lead to stagnation or quackery. Exactly my point. >True science has a tendency to win in the long run. Astronomy triumphed over >torture. I think modern "theories" can handle a little debunking. It would be nice, though, if, in this modern age, scientists with new ideas or observations did not have to go through what Galileo et al had to go through in the old days. The last thing we need is a New Inquisition. -- -------------------- Sarge Gerbode -- UUCP: pyramid!thirdi!metapsy!sarge Institute for Research in Metapsychology 950 Guinda St. Palo Alto, CA 94301