Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!nrl-cmf!mailrus!uwmcsd1!lakesys!tomk From: tomk@lakesys.UUCP (Tom Kopp) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: WHat are those holes for? Summary: Manholes Message-ID: <845@lakesys.UUCP> Date: 20 Jul 88 02:10:28 GMT References: <10790@oberon.USC.EDU> <327@richp1.UUCP> <303@btree.uucp> Organization: Lake Systems, Milwaukee Wisconsin Lines: 31 In article <303@btree.uucp>, rfarris@btree.uucp (rick farris) writes: > > Yes, and why the heck are manholes round? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the reason manholes are round is because it is impossible for a manhole cover to be pushed through the manhole, even though the actual hole is only minimally 'smaller' due to the rim than the cover. No matter how you turn it, a circle still has the same radius. Picture a square manhole, if you will. Each side being 2 feet in length (just for the purpose of this discussion). each side of the manhole is the same length, as is (of course) and measurment taken parallel to any side. However, between opposite corners, A and C below: A-----B | | | | D-----C The distance is the square root of 8 by pythagorean theorem (sum of the squares of A-D and D-C equals the square of A-C) which is >2. Thus, if you were to first rotate it on the A-D axis so that it were perpendicular to the ground, With B-C as the top and A-D as the bottom, then rotated it upon the A-B axis 45 degrees counter-clockwise (as seen from above) You could drop the cover straight through, as you would be putting an object of length 2ft through an opening of length (sqrt(8))....They don't want people dropping covers through the holes as they're quite heavy. This has been rather verbose, but I don't care. So sue me. -- _____ _____ |"Reading computer manuals without |tomk@lakesys.UUCP | | | the hardware is as frustrating as |uunet!marque!lakesys!tomk | \_| | reading sex manuals without the |uunet!uwmcsd1!lakesys!tomk ------------- software" - Arthur C. Clarke ----------------------------