Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!jesup
From: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Sw vs. Hw BitBlit.
Keywords: BitBlit.
Message-ID: <4409@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 2 Aug 88 21:34:11 GMT
References: <399@ma.diab.se> <1313@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu> <61783@sun.uucp> <1315@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu> <62296@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 11

In article <62296@sun.uucp> guy@gorodish.Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
>> Never mind, I suppose, that this is 3 1/2 years after publication
>> of the above and who knows how long before that it was written.
>> A few things have happened in this business since then.
>
>In other words, the common types of bitblt operations have changed since then?

	Yes.  Pike et al were only looking at blitters used for text-
oriented terminals that also had graphics capabilities.
-- 
Randell Jesup, Commodore Engineering {uunet|rutgers|allegra}!cbmvax!jesup