Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cgl.ucsf.edu!rl From: rl@cgl.ucsf.edu (Robert Langridge%CGL) Newsgroups: comp.graphics Subject: Re: Scientific visualization Message-ID: <11070@cgl.ucsf.EDU> Date: 2 Aug 88 23:32:46 GMT Sender: daemon@cgl.ucsf.edu Reply-To: rl@cgl.ucsf.edu (Robert Langridge) Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab Lines: 38 References: In article <1201@eos.UUCP> eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya) writes: [...comments on scientific visualization and criticism of overemphasis on "realism"...] >Bob (Langridge) I know you read this, comments? OK Gene: This is the closing paragraph of an abstract I wrote for the upcoming Molecular Graphics Society 7th Annual Meeting (and the first to be held in the US - at the Cathedral Hill Hotel, San Francisco, 10-13 August 1988). I can post the rest of my abstract and more information on the meeting if anyone is interested. "...computer graphics is now an essential tool, but the rapid decrease in cost and increase in power of commercial workstations suggests emphasis on the *integration* of graphics with numeric and symbolic computing and with large databases. Molecular modelers should treat com- puter graphics as a means of interacting with their computations to generate insight and to aid in reasoning, and not be seduced by the heavy emphasis on "realism" in the computer graphics field. If real-time images can be generated which correspond to the investigators model of "reality" they should be used, but "reality" is not a necessary property of images for successful scientific visualization. Their most important property is the information they convey." I have spent a lot of time and effort over the last 25 years trying to persuade my colleagues in molecular biology that graphics is a useful tool. Now I risk being labeled a reactionary! Bob Langridge rl@cgl.ucsf.edu Computer Graphics Laboratory University of California San Francisco CA 94143-0446 +1 415 476-2630, -1540, -5128