Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!linus!philabs!sbcs!root
From: root@sbcs.sunysb.edu (root)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Amiga or PC-AT ?
Summary: Nagle's information is dated and incorrect
Message-ID: <1472@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Date: 5 Aug 88 20:35:52 GMT
References: <1820006@hpuamsa.UUCP> <554@gort.cme-durer.ARPA> <356@uwslh.UUCP> <17611@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Lines: 14

In article <17611@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>, jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) writes:
> 

	I don't want to get into a rebuttal of John Nagle's comments
	on the Amiga; let me just say that his information is dated in
	some cases and incorrect in others.  I would suggest that for
	a clearer picture of the Amiga, the original poster should
	ask the same questions of comp.sys.amiga.  Let's get back to
	graphics here!

					Rick Spanbauer
					SUNY/Stony Brook