Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!m2c!applix!scott
From: scott@applix.UUCP (Scott Evernden)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: seeking problem solved w/ adaptec, have DiskPerf results.
Message-ID: <754@applix.UUCP>
Date: 3 Aug 88 04:47:36 GMT
References: <8807281433.AA02114@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <751@applix.UUCP> <5102@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Reply-To: scott@applix.UUCP (Scott Evernden)
Organization: APPLiX Inc., Westboro MA
Lines: 20

In article <5102@gryphon.CTS.COM> jdow@gryphon.CTS.COM (J. Dow) writes:
>Based on his figures he is running with a 2:1 interleave with fastmode. Those
>are about as good as it can do. I have not tried decreasing the number of
>buffers. Thanks for the tip. (Moot for me now as I use FFS exclusively these
>days. Love it! - Oh - for 4070's use 3:1 for best speed...)
>{@_@}

This was my best run (StarDrive to ST277N):

$ cat disk.i0.b8.fast

File create/delete:     create 10 files/sec, delete 26 files/sec
Directory scan:         48 entries/sec
Seek/read test:         78 seek/reads per second
r/w speed:              buf 512 bytes, rd 42281 byte/sec, wr 13582 byte/sec
r/w speed:              buf 4096 bytes, rd 52428 byte/sec, wr 13653 byte/sec
r/w speed:              buf 8192 bytes, rd 53498 byte/sec, wr 13582 byte/sec
r/w speed:              buf 32768 bytes, rd 53498 byte/sec, wr 13582 byte/sec

-scott