Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig5!wayneck From: wayneck@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM (Wayne Knapp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Overscan overrated? Keywords: ... sour owl .. Message-ID: <3118@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM> Date: 7 Aug 88 20:11:15 GMT Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or. Lines: 34 Okay, I'll bite. Just why do so many Amiga people think that overscan is such a big deal for desktop video? The big guys like PIXAR don't seem concerned about overscan. So why shouldn't desktop video mirror the big guys. Okay so you what NTSC. Fine a lot of TV's out there won't even show the fancy overscan stuff (that is why it is called overscan). Also note, by using overscan you use a LOT more memory per frame of video, which means you can't have as many frames for animation. Unless of coarse you have big bucks and can afford a single frame VCR that can support SMPTE timimg. (Talk about Mac ][ being expensive -- take a look at stdio quality VCR's) So it seems the cheap solution is record frames on to film. Well if you do that you don't care about overscan or even having NTSC level resolution. (By the way the Amiga can change colors much faster than you can with NTSC, which causes all kinds of color smearing, so things like dittering aren't very useful for NTSC recording) So if you what to really get outstanding animation done on your desk, you will probably want to use a camera of some sort to record the highest resoulition with the most colors the Amiga can produce. Then your finished film could be recorded into video format, but you would probably keep the film as a master. I think the Amiga is becoming a outstanding desktop video machine in the near term. Long term depends on C=. It the Amiga doesn't improve there could be trouble from the Reds and Blues a year or two down the road. I just have trouble believing the "overscan" is a lock out feature in the desktop video market. So what do you all HONESTLY think? Wayne Knapp