Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: RLL on non RLL drives
Keywords: RLL Seagate
Message-ID: <11708@steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 2 Aug 88 17:51:19 GMT
References: <4650@b-tech.UUCP> <790@jclyde.UUCP> <4654@b-tech.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 13

In article <4654@b-tech.UUCP> zeeff@b-tech.UUCP (Jon Zeeff) writes:

| A ST-251 I tried worked fine.  A 4096 wouldn't (at least with a Adaptec
| 2372).

  That's not a big enough sample! I have two which work on 2372. Of
course that's not a big enough sample, either. Adaptec says that the
4096 should work, and I would expect them to unless you have one which
is at the outer edge of the acceptable timing spec.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me