Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:17895 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:648 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!looking!brad From: brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: PK361.EXE Message-ID: <1916@looking.UUCP> Date: 9 Aug 88 18:21:43 GMT References: Reply-To: brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton) Organization: Looking Glass Software Ltd. Lines: 13 The posting said it was a "judgement in consent." Could somebody who knows American law tell us if that means what I think it means, namely that it's actually a settlement, agreed to by both parties, and not actually a judgement? If that's what it is, then aside from the usual clause that says "PK admits no fault or blame," PK has appeared to agree that he did infringe on SEA. (He has actually agreed to stop the alleged infringements). So I find destroying all SEA programs and sending money to PKWARE a rather unusual response to this, to say the least! -- Brad Templeton, Looking Glass Software Ltd. -- Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473