Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!eos!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!casseres
From: casseres@Apple.COM (David Casseres)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Version number questions
Message-ID: <15100@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 2 Aug 88 23:41:21 GMT
References: <5635@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <wWvuxzy00XoG43fl1g@andrew.cmu.edu> <4442@claris.UUCP> <390@uvabick.UUCP>
Reply-To: casseres@apple.apple.com.UUCP (David Casseres)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 11

In article <390@uvabick.UUCP> thomas@uvabick.UUCP (Thomas Fruin) writes:
>
>Let's put it differently: a ResEdit 1.2d1 which I have had for several
>months now worked fine, while the 1.2a1 which I pulled off AppleLink the
>other day is buggy (try making a new resource file, and creating a new
>resource in the file: bombs immediately).  What is the _better_ version?

I just tried this, using ResEdit 1.2a1, System 6.0, running under Multi-
Finder on a Mac II.  It worked fine; something else must be wrong in your
case.

David Casseres