Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2914 comp.unix.microport:1195
Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!mike
From: mike@ists (Mike Clarkson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3
Message-ID: <204@ists>
Date: 6 Aug 88 03:13:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: ists.204
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1988Jul30.141708.3175@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu>
Organization: Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science
Lines: 15


The only problems we've ever had running Xenix has been on cheap flaky
hardware.  On even moderately reliable hardware base, SCO Xenix is
a solid product.  Use Xenix on flaky hardware and yet get what you deserve
for being cheap.  We had a grand total one panic in the last year on 4
AT clones (Packard-Bell, AST and Compaq).

SCO Xenix is as reliable, and is easier to maintain than Unix
on a Sun, Vax, or Nation Semi.

-- 
Mike Clarkson					mike@ists.UUCP
Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science	mike@ists.yorku.ca
York University, North York, Ontario,		uunet!mnetor!yunexus!ists!mike
CANADA M3J 1P3					+1 (416) 736-5611