Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!pcrat!rick From: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: FP PROBLEM RESOLUTION Message-ID: <547@pcrat.UUCP> Date: 5 Aug 88 21:27:17 GMT References: <2432@inco.UUCP> <543@olgb1.oliv.co.uk> <1542@qiclab.UUCP> Reply-To: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) Organization: PC Research, Inc., Tinton Falls, NJ Lines: 26 In article <1542@qiclab.UUCP> neighorn@qiclab.UUCP (Steve Neighorn) writes: > >If you don't have a 80387, or have a D step 80386, the patch doesn't >need to be applied. >-- >Steven C. Neighorn !tektronix!{psu-cs,reed,ogcvax}!qiclab!neighorn >Intel Corporation "Where we BUILD the Star Fighters that defend the >Development Tools Operation frontier against Xur and the Ko-dan Armada" ^ Of course, you just build 'em. Us customers do the TESTING!!!!!! So, Steve, what is the procedure for us to trade in our bogus 80386's for a D step 386? Sure, maybe this one can be fixed in software, if we upgrade (at our cost!). And what kind of performance hit do we take. This is Intel's botch. Intel should fix it. -- Rick Richardson, PC Research, Inc. (201) 542-3734 (voice, nights) OR (201) 389-8963 (voice, days) uunet!pcrat!rick (UUCP) rick%pcrat.uucp@uunet.uu.net (INTERNET)