Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2919 comp.unix.microport:1204
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!uport!plocher
From: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3 (really a put-down of Xenix)
Keywords: long boring redundant
Message-ID: <401@uport.UUCP>
Date: 6 Aug 88 07:18:32 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1585@spdcc.COM> <1090@turnkey.TCC.COM>
Reply-To: plocher@uport.UUCP (John Plocher)
Organization: Microport Systems, Scotts Valley, CA
Lines: 16

In article <1090@turnkey.TCC.COM> Sanford 'Sandy' Zelkovitz writes:
>Let's talk about apples with apples: The Intel 386 "C" compiler and the
>Microsoft "C" compiler ......... Microport thought so much about the Intel
>                                 compiler that they don't use it anymore!

	Where did you hear this?  Not from here, cuz we *do* use the Intel
	"pcc" compiler on all our source - we *do* include the GreenHills C
	for those who want something else.

>Now to brass tacks! The interactive Unix system comes with only the provision
>for a two getty system. If you want more, you must buy the multi-user license.

	Don't blame ISC/BT/Microport for that one; the license requirement
	for more $$$ when (users > 2) is direct from AT&T :-(

	-John Plocher