Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:2925 comp.unix.microport:1215
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!elroy!gryphon!vector!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.UUCP (John F. Haugh II)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Xenix reliability (Was: Re: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3)
Message-ID: <5084@rpp386.UUCP>
Date: 6 Aug 88 22:40:15 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <1988Jul30.141708.3175@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <152@ispi.U
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.UUCP (The Beach Bum)
Organization: HASA, Division "S"
Lines: 22

In article <1498@ddsw1.UUCP> karl@ddsw1.UUCP (Karl Denninger) writes:
>In article <152@ispi.UUCP> jbayer@ispi.UUCP (id for use with uunet/usenet) writes:
>>In article <1988Jul30.141708.3175@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu>, woods@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Greg Woods) writes:
>>> 
>>> Anyone who thinks Xenix is reliable has NEVER seen a truely reliable system.

output of `stat' from crash on rpp386:

	sysname: XENIX
	nodename: rpp386
	release: 2.2.1
	version: SysV
	machine: i80386
	time of crash: Sat Aug  6 17:38:50 1988
	age of system: 31 days, 5 hrs., 27 mins.

thirty one days looks like reliable to me.
-- 
John F. Haugh II                 +--------- Cute Chocolate Quote ---------
HASA, "S" Division               | "USENET should not be confused with
UUCP:   killer!rpp386!jfh        |  something that matters, like CHOCOLATE"
DOMAIN: jfh@rpp386.uucp          |         -- apologizes to Dennis O'Connor