Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!uw-entropy!dataio!pilchuck!ssc!mcgp1!fst
From: fst@mcgp1.UUCP (Skip Tavakkolian)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: where to do line editing?
Summary: Maybe it is time for new data abstractions.
Message-ID: <1495@mcgp1.UUCP>
Date: 4 Aug 88 04:49:00 GMT
References: <678@gtx.com> <593@blblbl.UUCP> <8263@brl-smoke.ARPA> <611@tub.UUCP> <8296@smoke.ARPA>
Organization: Computer Tools Int'l Inc.
Lines: 22

In article <8296@smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
> In article <611@tub.UUCP> net@tub.UUCP (Oliver Laumann) writes:
> >The terminal does not know what a `word' is.
> So teach it.

I will take this opportune moment to drag this discussion in a new
direction.  I have been thinking about possible solutions to a similar problem
after I heard a keynote speech by Steve Johnson at a Usenix conference a few
years ago.  He asked what would pipes be (take the place of pipes) in the
context of icons.  I believe some of that is being answered with the
wide acceptance of C++.  I also believe it would require another data
abstraction, perhaps as widely accepted as the 8-bit-byte, that would have
the ability to carry more information about a phenomenon or an entity.
Maybe it is time to start thinking about what kind of standard that could
be.

Sincerely
-- 
Fariborz ``Skip'' Tavakkolian
UUCP	...!uw-beaver!tikal!mcgp1!fst

UNIX is a registered trademark of AT&T