Xref: utzoo misc.legal:5629 news.admin:3223 soc.women:12359
Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!alice!jj
From: jj@alice.UUCP
Newsgroups: misc.legal,news.admin,soc.women
Subject: Re: The Great Mark Ethan Smith Defamation Conspiracy
Message-ID: <8083@alice.UUCP>
Date: 3 Aug 88 16:29:18 GMT
References: <12624@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <1809@iscuva.ISCS.COM> <179@sulaco.UUCP> <11376@cisunx.UUCP>
Reply-To: jj@alice.UUCP (alice!jj)
Organization: AT*T-BL, Murray Hill, Signal Processing Research Department
Lines: 28

In article <11376@cisunx.UUCP> stfst@cisunx.UUCP writes:
>at all to post.  What the hell else does she ever post?  She makes "JJ" look
>like a saint!
...
>is all bull shit designed to stur up the net.  Why everyone flamed poor JJ
>while we tolerate this woman I'll never know.

Um, folks, can we all please start referring to the "jj" who posted
the begging article as jj@cup.portal.com?

The number of instances of confusion are steadily growing, and lots
of people just don't bother to make the distinction between the various
'jj' people on the net.  

Look, one fellow at SF USENIX told me "Oh, you're the OTHER jj,
I was wondering how well you'd fall off this wall".  I am STILL
getting mail directed to the jj@cup.portal.com from people who
seem to want to gloat (i.e. 'Hey, fella, drop out of school yet,since
your tuition didn't get paid?" and other such rot), and the CONSTANT
failure of people, even in news.*, to make the distinction, isn't
helping.

So, GET YOUR *(&^(*&^ JJ's STRAIGHT!
-- 
jj@alice.att.com, who has no affiliation whatsoever with 
(the former) jj@cup.portal.co.
Mail to either jj@alice.att.com or alice!jj
HASA, A division, S affiliations. Copyright alice!jj 1988.  All rights to mail reserved, USENET redistribution otherwise granted to those who allow free redistritution in a USENET-like manner.