Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!stats.ucl.ac.UK!gordon From: gordon@stats.ucl.ac.UK ("Gordon Joly, Statistics, UCL") Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest Subject: Re: science, lawfulness, a (the?) god (V8 #61) Message-ID: <19880823022356.4.NICK@HOWARD-JOHNSONS.LCS.MIT.EDU> Date: 23 Aug 88 02:23:00 GMT Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 21 Approved: ailist@ai.ai.mit.edu To: AIList <@ESS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK:AIList@ai.ai.mit.edu> cc: gordon%stats.ucl.ac.uk@ESS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK, YLIKOSKI%finfun.bitnet@ESS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK, ALHQC <@ESS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK,@earn-relay.ac.uk:ALHQC@cunyvm.bitnet>, harvey <@ESS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK:harvey@acf4.nyu.edu> Subject: Re: science, lawfulness, a (the?) god (V8 #61) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 88 06:39 EDT From: "Gordon Joly, Statistics, UCL" > From: > I would say that a God needs not be unlawful. A counterexample of > some kind could be a line by Einstein: I think he said that the > regularity of the structure of the universe reflects an intellect. (I > cannot remember the exact form of the quotation, but I think the idea > was this.) > --- Andy If I may be permitted to attempt a second approximation, Einstein said: "What really interests me, is the question of whether God had a *choice* in the design of the universe". I guess this encompasses all "things", including the human mind, no doubt. Gordon Joly.