Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!helios.ee.lbl.gov!lll-tis!daitc!jkrueger
From: jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil (Jonathan Krueger)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Databases: separate-file vs. monolithic file structure (was FoxBase)
Keywords: claims measurement comparison
Message-ID: <174@daitc.daitc.mil>
Date: 4 Sep 88 15:29:01 GMT
References: <861@sybase.sybase.com>
Reply-To: jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil.UUCP (Jonathan Krueger)
Organization: Defense Applied Information Technology Center, Alexandria VA
Lines: 13

In article <861@sybase.sybase.com> tim@linus.sybase.com (Tim Wood) writes:
>Herewith, I toot my own horn: Sybase is very well-written (having written 
>about 8-10% myself and reviewed about 90).  The system was designed
>with data integrity and performance as the primary goals.

And have you met those goals?  How do you measure your success?

-- Jon

-- 
Jonathan Krueger  uunet!daitc!jkrueger  jkrueger@daitc.arpa  (703) 998-4777

Inspected by: No. 15