Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!rutgers!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!alice!bs
From: bs@alice.UUCP (Bjarne Stroustrup)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Pointers to Inline Members
Summary: &inline ok
Message-ID: <8137@alice.UUCP>
Date: 27 Aug 88 23:40:18 GMT
References: <3690002@wdl1.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
Lines: 8



You have always been able to take the address of an inline function.
In that case the compiler must somehow lay down code for the pointer
to point to. Even 1.0 did that. 1.1 did that for inline members too.
You don't have to wait for 2.0 for that.

A similar trick is employed to let you take the address of a const.