Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:11995 comp.sys.ibm.pc:18286
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!sdrc!scjones
From: scjones@sdrc.UUCP (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Function declarations (was: MSC v5.1 Bug???)
Message-ID: <356@sdrc.UUCP>
Date: 22 Aug 88 21:02:05 GMT
References: <10102@genrad.UUCP> <11879@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <5680@rpp386.UUCP>
Organization: Structural Dynamics Research Corp., Cincinnati
Lines: 32

In article <5680@rpp386.UUCP>, jfh@rpp386.UUCP (The Beach Bum) writes:
> In article <11879@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> bobmon@iuvax.UUCP (RAMontante) writes:
> >Craig Dawson asks about a program in which two routines try to call a
> >third, somewhat as follows:
> >
> >x() { static z(); z(); }
> >y() { static z(); z(); }
> >
> >static z() { ; }
> >
> >(MSC apparently chokes; BTW, TurboC accepts it.) 
> 
> the msc compiler is broken.  the code should compile without error
> as written (more or less ...)

NO!!!  Amazingly enough, MSC got this right - the code is wrong.  Think about
this similar code:
  x() { static z[]; z[0] = 3; }
  y() { static z[]; z[0] = 5; }

  static z[10];
You wouldn't expect that to work, would you?  If something is declared within
a block, it must be defined within the same block unless it is declared extern.
Since you can't define functions within a block, you can't declare a static
function within a block.  Sorry.

----
Larry Jones                         UUCP: uunet!sdrc!scjones
SDRC                                      scjones@sdrc
2000 Eastman Dr.                    BIX:  ltl
Milford, OH  45150                  AT&T: (513) 576-2070
Nancy Reagan on superconductivity: "Just say mho."