Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!vsi1!altnet!uunet!mcvax!cernvax!hjm
From: hjm@cernvax.UUCP (Hubert Matthews)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: RPN, Fights for its life (was Re: Infix operators)
Message-ID: <810@cernvax.UUCP>
Date: 31 Aug 88 09:54:34 GMT
References: <8808121826.AA23206@jade.berkeley.edu> <1575@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <6882@well.UUCP> <1581@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <4057@juniper.uucp> <1585@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>
Reply-To: hjm@cernvax.UUCP (Hubert Matthews)
Organization: CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Lines: 9


English doesn't use much in the way of RPN, but take a look at German grammar.
The primary verb comes as the second idea in a sentence and any auxiliary verb
comes at the end.  In a subordinate clause, both the primary and the auxiliary
verbs come at the end.

Just to show that RPN isn't that strange a concept....

	Hubert Matthews