Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!vsi1!lmb From: lmb@vsi1.UUCP (Larry Blair) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Dynamic vs. passive routing: site rights Message-ID: <971@vsi1.UUCP> Date: 28 Aug 88 01:48:22 GMT References: <4735@b-tech.UUCP> <96@volition.dec.com> Reply-To: lmb@vsi1.UUCP (Larry Blair) Organization: VICOM Systems Inc., San Jose, CA Lines: 11 In article <96@volition.dec.com> vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul Vixie) writes: >I have an even better idea -- everyone on the net should mark all known >active rerouters as DEAD. That will save _everyone_ a lot of trouble. I made the suggestion many moons ago that the maps should indicate what kind of routing (i.e. active, passive, none) that a site does. I still think its a good idea, but I doubt that the powers that be would like it because it would make it too easy to avoid their sites. -- Larry Blair ames!vsi1!lmb