Xref: utzoo news.groups:5302 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:4511 comp.protocols.misc:336 comp.dcom.lans:1772 comp.unix.wizards:10893
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!gatech!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!decvax!eagle_snax!geoff
From: geoff@eagle_snax.UUCP ( R.H. coast near the top)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.misc,comp.dcom.lans,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Proposed creation of comp.protocols.nfs
Keywords: newgroup,nfs,onc
Message-ID: <342@eagle_snax.UUCP>
Date: 4 Sep 88 12:06:00 GMT
Lines: 28

A number of people on the NFS mailing list (nfs@bcm.tmc.edu), together
with a few who are effectively out of reach of it, have proposed
that a newsgroup comp.protocols.nfs be created to provide a broader
forum for discussion of NFS, RPC/XDR and related issues. For instance,
I'd like to see discussions which include such things as FTAM, Greenberg &
Keene's NFILE, RFS, Domain, and the Andrew file system. A quick scan of
comp.protocols, comp.dcom, selected comp.sys groups and comp.unix
showed 19 articles with a subject field which included "[Nn][Ff][Ss]",
with a further 6 in comp.sys.sun (sun-spots). (We expire "comp." after
14 days.) Together these would suggest that comp.protocols.nfs would have
an acceptable traffic level. For now, I see no need to make it a
moderated group.

As usual, please mail comments to me. I'll summarize to the net and (if
the response is positive) issue a call for votes. Please mail
directly, rather than using 'r': my Usenet path is usually horribly
circuitous...

Geoff

PS Various terms used above are trademarks, and the appropriate
squiggles, superscript microcharacters and attributions should be understood.

-- 
Geoff Arnold, Sun Microsystems Inc.+------------------------------------------+ 
PC Distrib. Sys. (home of PC-NFS)  |Did you remember to stick your disclaimer |
UUCP:{hplabs,decwrl...}!sun!garnold|stamp here to qualify for your free gift? |
ARPA:geoff@sun.com                 +------------------------------------------+