Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hptsug2!taylor From: newman.pasa@Xerox.COM (Newman) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: "Personal" Computers Message-ID: <437@hptsug2.HP.COM> Date: 21 Aug 88 06:06:13 GMT Sender: taylor@hptsug2.HP.COM Lines: 32 Approved: taylor@hplabs Two computers that are very easy for me to personalize are the Xerox Lisp machine I use at work and the Apple Macintosh SE I have at home. The Xerox machine is personalizeable because every part of the software is available to me. I can change the behavior of any part of the system by writing a little code and sticking it in my INIT.LISP file. The Mac is personalizeable thanks to the many shareware utilities that I have; these allow me to change the behavior of the system by including INITs in my system folder or by editing the resource fork of a file (usually the system file) with an appropriate utility. Would you call either of these machines "personal"? Neither is really portable in the sense that I can carry it around easily on the spur of the moment. On the other hand, it is possible to change the behavior of my machines so greatly that other people will not be able to use them easily (e.g. by switching to a DVORAK keyboard layout or otherwise redefining fundamental aspects of the user interface). I take advantage of the ability to customize the behavior of my machines. Other users do not. Does this make the computers themselves any more or less "personal"? In both cases, it requires some technical expertise to customize these machines; does this make the machines more or less "personal"? I am the only person that uses either machine; does this affect their degree of "personal"-ness? My point is that our definition of "personal" is remarkably imprecise so far. Dave Taylor says "personal" is the same as customizable. Gary Ericson says "personal" is portable and versatile. I think I can personalize something that is not portable (e.g. an office), and I would call some things personal that I never customize or that are single-function devices (e.g. a toothbrush). Can we come up with a more precise definition of the term "personal"? >>Dave