Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!proxftl!bill
From: bill@proxftl.UUCP (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.sources.archives
Message-ID: <671@proxftl.UUCP>
Date: 30 Aug 88 03:37:19 GMT
References: <3261@edm.UUCP> <1349@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>
Reply-To: bill@proxftl.UUCP (T. William Wells)
Organization: Proximity Technology, Ft. Lauderdale
Lines: 24
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:
Distribution:
Keywords:

In article <3261@edm.UUCP> rroot@edm.UUCP (Stephen Samuel) writes:
: If at all possible, I think it would be a good thing if the newsgroup were
: moderated. Since it IS supposed to be a concentrated source of usefull info,
: it would be counter-productive if it had a high noise content.
:   Is anyone willing to moderate such a group.  I'm sorta' willing, but we're
: nowhere NEAR an archive site here, and unlikely to be one in the near future.

Well, I already keep all archive information I run across, so I
could do this.  What I mean is that I could both moderate such a
group and keep an archive-archive.  Though we'd have to be a
mail-based server, since we are a uucp site.  I don't *think*
that would be a problem.

In article <1349@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>, root@cca.ucsf.edu (Thos Sumner) writes:
: > I'd suggest two groups: comp.sources.archives and
: > comp.sources.archives.d
:
: The archives directory group should not be a subgroup of sources.

Agreed. Let's call them comp.archives and comp.archives.d.

---
Bill
novavax!proxftl!bill