Xref: utzoo comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:867 comp.sources.wanted:4901 comp.sources.d:2624 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!phri!cooper!dasys1!tneff From: tneff@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Neff) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d,comp.sources.wanted,comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.sources.archives Message-ID: <6146@dasys1.UUCP> Date: 29 Aug 88 18:09:13 GMT References: <222@pigs.UUCP> <6031@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> <236@pigs.UUCP> <478@c10sd1.StPaul.NCR <362@pigs.UUCP> Reply-To: tneff@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Neff) Organization: Independent Users Guild Lines: 12 One question about comp.sources.archives: would archive sites be tempted to post their entire file directory listings, with comments, to the group? Would it be too much to carry if they did? Should postings be limited to "I archive these newsgroups and RFCs"? Will users post numerous requests for specific files ("has anyone got this" etc)? Should the group be moderated for the foregoing reasons? Okay, FIVE questions. :-) -- Tom Neff UUCP: ...!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!tneff "None of your toys CIS: 76556,2536 MCI: TNEFF will function..." GEnie: TOMNEFF BIX: t.neff (no kidding)