Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Posting src/bin in comp.sys.amiga (was: Re: VirusX 1.6)
Message-ID: <8808290546.AA27315@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 29 Aug 88 05:46:03 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 21

:In article <2312.AA2312@heimat>, sneakers@heimat.UUCP (Dan "Sneakers" Schein) writes:
:   My desire is not so much to minimize cost (since I do receive all 5 of
:   the Amiga groups) as much as is it is to see the binaries and sources
:   return to there proper groups. Its seems that the posting of binaries
:   and sources in the message groups have started to become the rule rather
:   than the exception.
:It would probably help matters a bit if the sources/binaries groups were
:just a tad more active.  And consistant.  Don't you think?
:

	How about just unmoderating binaries and sources?  The concept of
moderation is nice and all, but just isn't working for us.  Frankly, I
think WE as a group are responsible enough to do it.  Right now I don't
really give a @#$ if the stuff is archived, just as long as it gets posted
in a reasonable amount of time.

	One thing that *cannot* be done is to post major source/binary
distributions over comp.sys.amiga .... many sites would not be able to
afford it.

					-Matt