Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!amdahl!ems!rosevax!orbit!pnet51!shawn
From: shawn@pnet51.cts.com (Shawn Stanley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: C compiler for IIe
Message-ID: <42@orbit.UUCP>
Date: 2 Sep 88 17:17:32 GMT
Sender: root@orbit.UUCP
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.
Lines: 16

My opinion of the Aztec C //e development system is that it's workable,
although there are bugs.  I don't know if Manx does any development on
that version anymore or not.  I had purchased the ProDOS version, which
had some rather nasty bugs, and while they were supposed to be fixed in
future releases, I haven't heard anything to that effect.  Has anyone
else?

But it IS the best C for the Apple //e.  Since there is no other C.
And Manx has a solid reputation in the IBM PC market -- I've used their
PC compiler quite extensively.

I like Manx.  And I think the Apple //e version is workable, although
it has its problems.  If you want a list of bugs, maybe you can get the
(them frLge) from 212/542-2793, the Manx BBS.

UUCP: {rosevax, crash}!orbit!pnet51!shawn
INET: shawn@pnet51.cts.com