Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:18687 comp.sys.att:4164 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!chasm From: chasm@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Charles Marslett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.att Subject: Re: Whats the best DOS upgrade path? Summary: Do not forget to DOS-format! Keywords: DOS upgrade Message-ID: <5401@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> Date: 3 Sep 88 15:51:29 GMT References: <39457@linus.UUCP> Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 46 In article <39457@linus.UUCP>, mhg@mitre-bedford.ARPA (Mark H. Granoff) writes: > > I have read quite a bit lately (here, in fact) that BACKUP/RESTORE > between DOS versions doesn't work. Whether that's true or not (is > it?), I am not planning on using DOS BACKUP and RESTORE. I got a copy > of FastBack+, which I am told by others, works just fine on AT&Ts. > Any comments? Will I be able to read FastBack+-written disks (under > DOS 2.11) under DOS 3.x? Yes, so long as you used the same version of FASTBACK, the save/restore will go flawlessly (or so it always has been for me and everyone I know!). > Since I will have to reformat, what is the exact procedure? I think I > know, but I would like to check it out before I start: > > 1. DOS BACKUP my FastBack+ directory, to RESTORE later onto 3.x > disk, rather than reinstall it from scratch. > 2. Low level format with interleave factor 3. > 3. FDISK to create partition. 3a. Format the partition using the new DOS (I always do a "FORMAT/S" since this seems more reliable (gut feel) than a format followed by a sys. > 4. SYS to copy 3.x system. 4. SYS only if you did a FORMAT without the "/S" above. > 5. DOS 3.x RESTORE of FastBack+ directory. > 6. FastBack+ restore (all but DOS 2.11 stuff) > > Right?? Will I be able to run DOS 3.x RESTORE on DOS 2.11 BACKUP > disks???? I do not know, I have always just reinstalled FASTBACK -- a better alternative is just copy the \fastback directory to a floppy without using BACKUP/RESTORE (the only thing that is different from a reinstall is the presence of the backup directory file, I think). > Thanks for the information. You're welcome (especially if I got it right!) Charles Marslett chasm@killer.dallas.tx.us