Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:19884 comp.sys.mac.programmer:2262
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!elroy!peregrine!zardoz!dhw68k!bytebug
From: bytebug@dhw68k.cts.com (Roger L. Long)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: LSC 3.0 Gripes or Commendations?
Keywords: LSC 3.0 items to note
Message-ID: <11062@dhw68k.cts.com>
Date: 31 Aug 88 13:08:48 GMT
References: <12121@cisunx.UUCP>
Reply-To: bytebug@dhw68k.cts.com (Roger L. Long)
Organization: Wolfskill residence; Anaheim, CA (USA)
Lines: 15

In article <12121@cisunx.UUCP> jasst3@cisunx.UUCP (Jeffrey A. Sullivan) writes:
>If there's anything about LSC 3.0 of particular merit (or demerit), I'd like
>to hear about it for a possible magazine article I'm writing.

My main gripes with Think-C are:

	it generates some of the worst code I've seen a compiler generate

		and

	it sure would be nice if I wasn't locked into using their editor (i.e.
	if the thing were modular enough that I could write my own "shell" 
	and "editor" to look and feel the way that I want.
-- 
	Roger L. Long
	dhw68k!bytebug