Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!chianti!shane
From: shane@chianti.cc.umich.edu (Shane Looker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: ResEdit question
Message-ID: <661@mailrus.cc.umich.edu>
Date: 29 Aug 88 20:34:01 GMT
References: <730057@hpcilzb.HP.COM> <767@helios.ee.lbl.gov> <13685@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: usenet@mailrus.cc.umich.edu
Reply-To: shane@um.cc.umich.edu (Shane Looker)
Organization: University of Michigan Computing Center, Ann Arbor
Lines: 24

In article <13685@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> laba-5ai@e260-1e.berkeley.edu (Glenn McElhoe) writes:
>
>By the way, does anyone know of something better than ResEdit, or a newer
>version then 1.1?  I mean, ResEdit is a much better way than RMaker to generate
>and alter resources, but it's got soooo many problems.  (Multi-Finder incom-
>patibility for one)  Maybe with the Mac II, the people at apple could put
>together a new version with a color icon and clut picker.
>
>Just some ideas, because I can't believe everyone gets along with a program as
>unreliable as ResEdit.
>
>--
>Glenn McElhoe


You should try the ResEdit 1.2 version.  (Check Sumex.)  I agree that ResEdit
can be very clunky to use for many things.  That's why there will soon be
something much nicer to use for all those messy resouce problems.  (Well, not 
all, but many.)
 
(Watch this keyboard for an exciting announcement in the very near future.)

Shane Looker
Looker@um.cc.umich.edu